me
All products are independently selected by our editorial team. If you buy something, we may receive an affiliate commission.
The Best Metal Mixing Bowls The Best Glass Mixing Bowls The Best Plastic Mixing Bowls A Brief Review of Mixing Bowl Materials How We Tested What We Were Looking for Findings from Other Mixing Bowls We’ve Tested
Whether you’re moving into your first apartment, fresh out of college, a newlywed nest, or a long-time home cook, it’s essential to have the best set of mixing bowls on hand. Mix pancake batter, crack eggs for omelettes, stir pasta, toss salads, emulsify salad dressings, mix cookie dough, marinate chicken thighs, fold a batch of brownies, rise bread dough, or simply freeze it. Grabbing popcorn on the couch, there’s hardly a meal or occasion when you don’t reach for some.
While it’s certainly possible to put together your own line of bowls, many companies sell mixing bowls in stackable kits, which actually provide value and storage benefits. But bowls come in different sizes, shapes and materials. To determine which popular sets are the most versatile and reliable, we spent a lot of time stirring, mixing, and melting several leading mixing bowl sets. Read on to find our top picks, and scroll on to learn more about how we tested and what we look for in a mixing bowl.
With an attractive brushed stainless steel finish and comfortable, easy-to-grip rounded edges, these high-quality mixing bowls make an immediate impression, and that opinion is reinforced after several days of daily use in the kitchen. Although this set only includes three bowls, the sizes (1.5, 3 and 5 liter bowls) are sufficient for most everyday cooking tasks.
The lightweight design of Cuisinart Nesting Bowls makes them easy to move and stack, allowing you to comfortably hold them with one hand and stir with the other. The rounded bottoms of the smaller and larger bowls fit perfectly into one of my pans and make a great steamer. With a simple, airtight plastic lid, the Cuisinart bowl also does double duty as a food storage container, cooking and storing all your food in one go. Despite being tossed into a sink full of dirty dishes and banged against countertops several times, these bowls handily withstood all the abuse without leaving any dents or warping, although the electric mixer did give them a bit of a scratch.
The well balanced lid is a nice addition to the bowl set and fits easily into each bowl. However, it’s the whipped cream test that really sets these bowls apart from the rest. Unlike its smaller competitors, the deep interior and high walls of the Cuisinart bowl keep my counters safe from splatters and splatters, even when using a hand mixer at high speed. The smooth, rounded corners penetrate easily with a spoon or rubber spatula, making scraping and spooning easy.
Some kind of non-slip bottom might help since they will slide around if you don’t hold them firmly, but on the other hand, something like a silicone bottom will prevent them from being used as a steamer. During the whipping cream test, they also found a few scratches on the electric mixer, which made me wonder how durable the bowl would be over time.
Pyrex tempered glass bowls have been a staple in American kitchens for generations, and for good reason. Their bowls are durable, well-designed, and versatile enough to move safely and stylishly from the countertop or microwave straight to the dining table. Each Pyrex bowl has a rim for easy grip. What ultimately ensures the Pyrex bowl’s place at the top is its versatility as a storage item, given that it comes with a lid. For $30 you won’t find a better deal.
These bowls are smaller than our best stainless steel and plastic picks. Even in the largest bowls, it’s easy for whipped cream to spill onto the counter and get a little messy on the surface of the pan as the chocolate melts. We often stir less vigorously than with other bowls to avoid turning the cooking area into a splatter zone. It’s the versatility of this set that saves it. Note. Kits are also available that include a 4 liter bowl.
Competition in this category is fierce, but ultimately we decided that Farberware makes the best plastic mixing bowls. Mainly because they have the perfect combination of features we love in other plastic bowls – handles for gripping, spout for easy pouring of batter, no unnecessary extra bowls included, microwave safe, rubber non-slip base that doesn’t move, and the makeup is relatively solid. Unlike some of the other bowls we tested, the Farberware bowl didn’t get the same ratings from the electric hand mixer. They didn’t have the curved edges we like, but they were still easy to hold while we mixed the pancake ingredients and whipped cream. While they seem a little wider than some other bowls we like, there was much less splatter in the whipped cream batter. In terms of appeal, these bowls are available in five different color combinations, so you can use them for as many servings as the actual mixing.
We’re not big fans of the extra girth of Farber ceramic bowls. While they’re still tall on the sides, they seem a little wider than some others we like. They also don’t have the exaggerated lip that we like in other bowls, but those two qualities might just be personal preference.
While there are hundreds of mixing bowl sets on the market, most are made from stainless steel, copper, glass, and plastic (though we also tried a bamboo bowl set). Each has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Inexpensive, durable and lightweight, stainless steel bowls are essential in a professional restaurant kitchen and can do double duty as a steamer. But they are not suitable for microwave heating. It is worth noting that professional chefs and bakers prefer stainless steel. No matter the temperature in your kitchen, stainless steel stays cool, ensuring your dough always maintains a cool temperature. In addition, eggs in stainless steel bowls beat and harden faster.
Like stainless steel bowls, copper mixing bowls are great for maintaining an even temperature while preparing dough. In fact, when you beat eggs, copper ions bind to the eggs and these ions prevent the eggs from deflating and keep them super fluffy as they expand. Julia Child states in Mastering the Art of French Cooking that copper cookware is the tastiest cookware. This is quite a compliment! But while copper is high quality, it tends to be more expensive (and more fragile) than other materials. Because we’re committed to finding the most practical, everyday mixing bowls that can stand up to anything, we’ve excluded copper bowls from this particular review (though you can check out our guide to copper cookware here).
Glass bowls are microwave safe and look more attractive if you want to use them for preparing and serving food, but they are much heavier than stainless steel bowls, which can make them feel bulky, especially when you try to hold. hold the bowl with one hand. On the other hand, you may want the weight to ensure the bowl stays firmly on the counter no matter how hard you stir. It’s a matter of personal preference.
Plastic and melamine bowls are durable and shatterproof, but are generally less versatile than stainless steel or glass bowls because they cannot be used as a steamer and generally cannot be placed in the microwave. They also tend to scratch over time, making them unsuitable for tasks such as whipping egg whites, as any grease left in the gaps can ruin the result. Plastic can also develop an odor over time and become discolored when in contact with ingredients such as ketchup or turmeric.
Mixing bowls play many different roles in the kitchen, so to evaluate their versatility, we tried to cover several areas in our test. First, stir the simple pancake mixture into all the bowls. (In a previous round of testing, we made double chocolate brownies.) After that, we cleaned and dried all the bowls, took out the hand-held electric mixers, and used each bowl to make fresh whipped cream. Lastly, we used a stainless steel and glass bowl as a double boiler to melt the chocolate (don’t use plastic as a double boiler).
You might be tempted by a set of six different bowls, but if more than one of them is a smaller bowl, so small it’s essentially a glorified ramekin, what’s the point? Instead, when choosing mixing bowls, look for an assortment that includes at least one small (1-1.5 liter) mixing bowl and two large bowls with a capacity of 3 to 8 liters, so you have enough space to confidently fold, mix and not do it. Don’t worry about the mess. Generally speaking, you can find bowls in the following sizes: 1½, 2, 2½, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 liters.
A good mixing bowl should be able to withstand heavy use and be easy to clean. Of course, it is dishwasher safe, no dents, scratches, stains or odor.
If you want to spend money, save it and buy fancy bowls and plates. Mixing bowls are workhorses. While build quality is important, these kitchen tools should be priced accordingly and affordably.
Bamboozle nesting bowls have many great designs that make them desirable. They’re made from biodegradable bamboo, have nice tall sides for easy stirring, and stack for easy storage. The only problem is that they are not microwave or dishwasher safe. This isn’t a bad idea for people who don’t have a dishwasher, but if you want a mixing bowl that doesn’t require hand washing, pretty much any option other than the Bamboozle bowl will do. However, if having an eco-friendly kitchen is important and you value the visual appeal and design of the Bamboozle Bowl. We say they’re worth it.
These stainless steel restaurant serving mixing bowls have many advantages: they are lightweight, easy to handle, inexpensive, proportional and can be nested for easy storage. We love that the largest bowl has a capacity of 8 quarts, which is 3 quarts larger than the largest bowl in the Cuisinart 3-piece set. But while the bowls performed well in the brownie and chopped salad tests, they didn’t perform well in the whipped cream test. Why: With a wider opening and shallower walls than our top pick, these bowls are less able to catch stray drips and splatters, especially when using a hand mixer. So, in the end, the Cuisinart set is a safer choice overall.
Like most Oxo products, this set has some clever design features. We appreciate the deep bowl, high sides, and built-in spout, which make transferring dough from bowl to baking sheet easy and clean. The rubber handle on the base is also a nice touch, allowing the bowl to sit securely on the counter even during the most intense whisking and stirring. While Oxo’s molded, unbreakable, BPA-free plastic looks well made, durable, and durable for long-term use, we were worried that this set would have the same drawbacks as all plastic mixing bowls: stains, traps odors, and scratches. easily.
After we tested the plastic kit, we decided we wanted to test the stainless steel kit as well. Like plastic mixing bowls, they also have rubber handles on the base, which ultimately puts them out of the best metal bowl competition since they can’t be converted into a steamer. This is quite unfortunate because we like the weight and high sides. It’s also about the same price as the Cuisinart set, so if you want a stainless steel set and don’t plan on doing a lot of double boiling, this might be for you.
These bowls, with deep interiors and tall sides, are similar in design to the Cuisinart set (this set includes two very small prep bowls), but the difference in design is obvious once you hold them in your hands. Overall, the FineDine bowls feel more fragile and cheaper to make, and while they are slightly cheaper, the small price difference doesn’t seem to justify concerns about them wearing out over a long period of use. The FineDine lid is also difficult to put on and has an unreliable seal. While I personally had no problems with discoloration, many Amazon user reviews mentioned issues with dents, scratches, and rust.
The Material reBowl does everything a plastic bowl does. This is the viewer. It has high sides and a stable base that allows you to place ingredients in the middle. Microwave oven is safe. It’s made from recycled plastic and feels very durable—the most durable of all the plastic bowls we tested. Plus it has that cute sponge we wanted on the bowl. The only thing missing is the handle, spout and the rest of the bowl. For $25 you only get a bowl that’s about the same size as the average bowl in the set, so it’s not as valuable as other sets. Plus, its smaller size means there’s more splashing when whipping cream.
At the time of this writing, these bowls cost around $9, making them a bargain and ideal for college students moving into their first apartment. The shape is very similar to the reBowl, just a little taller so the ingredients don’t spill out. They’re also microwave safe for extra points. However, they appear fragile to the point that we doubt their durability over time. While we like the tall sides, we wonder if they’re too tall considering we weren’t able to fit the electric mixer all the way to the edges. This is a good budget option for a plastic bowl, but for just $20 you can get our Farberware option that doesn’t seem too far-fetched.
If these bowls were microwave safe, they might become our favorite plastic set. But otherwise it’s a solid package and attractive colors. The bowl is easy to hold while mixing, and there is virtually no splatter when making whipped cream. However, we also noticed that the TV’s muted color made it susceptible to the sounds of an electric mixer.
The main thing we don’t like about these bowls is the size. While other plastic bowls have tall sides that create a recess for storing ingredients, this set is more like serving bowls. The largest bowl is huge, its volume is 7 liters, which is too much for us personally. They also have a large girth, which we think makes them a little difficult to hold. The plastic itself feels thick and durable, but it does make it a little harder to crack eggs around the edges as it feels a little dull. However, these bowls are microwave safe, which is a nice plus.
They almost beat out Pyrex bowls as the best glass set. The Anchor Hocking’s maximum bowl size is slightly larger than the largest Pyrex bowls, which made us a little less wary of side spills than the Pyrex and Duralex glass bowls we tested (though they still had low sides, which we found didn’t like it). We also noticed that when the 2.5 liter bowl was placed on top of the double simmer pan, it didn’t move at all. The main reason these Anchor Hocking bowls didn’t win (besides the fact that the pyrex bowl also doubles as a storage item) is because there are too many bowls. It’s a set of ten, which seems like too much and you’re paying for extra. This set costs about $50 compared to $30 for Pyrex.
These bowls are made and are the same size as Pyrex bowls, but they also come in sets of nine which are too large and some of the nine bowls are not designed for mixing. Getting ready for the stage? Maybe. But don’t mix. Even the largest bowl (2.5 liters) has low sides, which means there is quite a lot of whipped cream. And there’s no ridge or way to easily hold the bowl, and at $58 as of this writing, it’s hard to justify the purchase.
Cuisinart Stainless Steel Bowls with Lid are the best stainless steel choice for a well-built, versatile and convenient set that will provide years of enjoyable and practical use. We especially love their rolled lips and high, deep sides, which make it easy to grab and hold whatever you’re mixing in a bowl rather than on the counter. The matching lid is durable and airtight, making the bowl ideal for marinating, storing leftovers, or transporting food to parties and dinners.
While we prefer to use stainless steel for mixing bowls, for anyone who prefers glass or plastic (which will work too), we recommend a Pyrex glass set and a Farberware plastic set. Both rank among the best in terms of versatility and durability.
© 2024 Conde Nast. All rights reserved. Through partnerships with retailers, Epicurious may receive a portion of sales from products purchased through our site. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad selection
Post time: Nov-04-2024